Link to the coverage.

But more importantly, here’s a link to the ACTUAL report.

So, what’s the scoop?

Let’s grab it straight from the NYT article.

A report released on Tuesday on accusations of widespread sexual abuse in the northern England city of Rotherham found that about 1,400 minors — some as young as 11 years old — were beaten, raped and trafficked from 1997 to 2013 as the local authorities ignored a series of red flags.

Some children were doused in gasoline and threatened with being set on fire if they reported their abusers, the report said, and others were forced to watch rapes and threatened with the same fate. In more than a third of the cases, the victims appear to have been known to child protection agencies, but the police and local government officials failed to act.

Within hours of the report’s publication, the leader of the local government council resigned.

“Having considered the report, I believe it is only right that I, as leader, take responsibility on behalf of the council for the historic failings that are described so clearly in the report, and it is my intention to do so,” said Roger Stone, the leader of the Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council since 2003.

Wow. That’s pretty frickin’ horrific. That works out to roughly a new girl being sexually abused every 4 days.

Let’s keep going, and see where the controversy comes up.

Again, from the NYT article:

The vast majority of perpetrators have been identified as South Asian and most victims were young white girls, adding to the complexity of the case. Some officials appeared to believe that social workers pointing to a pattern of sexual exploitation were exaggerating, while others reportedly worried about being accused of racism if they spoke out. The report accused officials of ignoring “a politically inconvenient truth” in turning a blind eye to men of Pakistani heritage grooming vulnerable white girls for sex.

Uh oh. I’m guessing you can see where the outcry is coming.

And to make things worse…

Three earlier reports, published from 2002 to 2006, detailed the abuse, and according to Ms. Jay, “could not have been clearer in the description of the situation in Rotherham.” But the first one was “effectively suppressed” and the other two “ignored,” she said.

Some officials were apparently ordered by their managers to withhold information on the ethnic origin of the abusers, the report said. As a result, no contact was made with local Pakistani leaders for help in identifying gangs that continued to assault and abduct teenagers.

So, it might seem like the situation was kept under wraps for 16 years in order to protect the primarily-Pakistani dudes. MY GOD LOOK WHAT THE POLITICALLY CORRECT MOVEMENT HAS CAUSED. IT CAUSES HORRIFIC SHIT LIKE THIS TO BE COVERED UP.

Here is an inaccurate analysis of the situation and why the situation got as screwed up as it did (which is incredibly screwed up FYI-none of this post is condoning what was done here).


Except that’s not what the report actually says.

Here, I’m passing it off to Lord Squishy from Sufficient Velocity, actual lawyer and good debater, who breaks down the report. It’s a bit long, but worth looking over. Look below these two images for a Tl;DR.



The last sentence is an important one: This appears to be a situation where there were a multitude of factors which differed significantly depending on where your position was in the hierarchy.

“But wait Adarsha!” you say. “What are those multitude of factors?”

Ask and ye shall receive. This stuff is all in the report, but I didn’t take photos and put them here because this is already a pretty pic-heavy post, and honestly it’s not too hard to find the actual information (going off of Squishy’s post below) in the report if you know what to look for.

squishybbc3In addition, chronic underfunding was an issue according to the report-we’re talking nearly 40% staff vacancy rate for social workers at one point, which would certainly contribute to the oversights.

Keep in mind that there are a lot of pencil-pushers and middlemen in the office who probably had no idea what was going on. The amount of people going “AW YEA SCANDAL FORMING PEOPLE GETTING RAPED AND I’M GONNA NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT EM AND LAUGH AND DRINK COFFEE WHILE TWIRLING MY POINTED MOUSTACHE” was probably a very small set. The reality is more complicated.

But what about the whole Pakistani thing? Doesn’t the fact that a large fraction of the perpetrators were Pakistani mean anything? Or their culture/set of values?

Well, yea. But not necessarily what you think. The screwed up ideals/values that lead to these atrocities are not uniquely Pakistani. You can find similar versions anywhere in the world, regardless of ethnicity. Rape/abuse culture do not intrinsically belong to any one people. It is an issue that can be found among any race (as meaningless of a term as that is biologically). 

Moving on!

First, I want to reiterate: I am not condoning any of the cases of abuse. These are all horrific, and this is still a scandal of huge proportions. But this scandal was not caused by a desire to be politically correct. Only those with an agenda against certain groups will claim that.

I ask them to not politicize the abuse of 1400 girls and abuse the horrifying acts simply to slander groups they don’t like for no valid reason.

Finally, I extend my sincerest condolences to those girls and their families. Hopefully, bringing this scandal to light can bring out reforms (and more funding) to ensure that things like this don’t happen again.






  1. Interesting blogpost 🙂 I do think that there is something slightly different in the heritage of Pakistan in the sense that they protect their women and girls and would not let them wander the streets at night. Therefore there is an understandable sense of the girls being up for it because otherwise they would be less careless and available like their own sisters and daughters. But having said that, the reports you quote indeed show that one of the barriers to investigation was the police view that the girls were consenting. I think this is the elephant in the room.

    I feel the cultural issue plays some part, but is insignificant in comparison to the issue of the silly ideas fed to the girls themselves by well-meaning parents, teachers, carers, tv and wider society.

    Elsewhere it is said that some girls felt this person was their boyfriend, at least at first, when they were kind to them to draw them in. Then it was too late for them to get out of the situation and they were owned and passed round. This is why the law says consenting ADULTS, and why the law cannot actually protect. It is up to us as a society to teach young girls not to be bought and flattered and to be told the apparently radical notion that they are NOT old enough to decide to sleep with anyone at all. Because they are really not old enough to make that decision. I see lots of girls who are basically being used by boyfriends (mostly white boys/men) without the slightest clue of the guy’s intentions even when it is obvious to everyone else. They guy thinks it’s easy sex on tap for the minor inconvenience of pretending to care. I feel that the messages we give of sexual freedom (“You Go Girl!) and the messages that they get that it’s ok if they use a condom makes children wide open to abuse before they even have a chance to understand what is going on.

    A recent survey of young people reported that teenagers felt pressured into having sex too early by parents and teachers over-eager to prove how cool and understanding they are of young people’s issues.

    I think we have let down a whole generation of young people, not just in Rotherham, but everywhere in the country.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s